PUSH PLAY TO VIEW THE SHORT WELCOME VIDEO FROM ALASKA

There isn’t a company in the world today that doesn’t emphasize the importance of customer service. Their annual reports always focus on their commitment (and the commitment of their outstanding associates) to meeting the needs of their customers. Their mission statements, while generally hard to understand, somehow insures that customer service (usually in some other ubiquitous terms) is an important part of the company’s vision.

This week, the New York Stock Exchange released its third annual survey of CEO’s from around the world. It wasn’t surprising that these company leaders believe that meeting and exceeding customer expectations is the key to driving sustainable growth in the future. The survey, as reported in USA Today, said that with so much product (and store) parity it was customer service that could be the key differentiator in the marketplace. Sounds like branding to me! The CEO’s also said that they would budget more dollars for customer relationship management in 2008 to reflect that they are serious about serving the customer. This made me wonder if they were as committed to building and strengthening their brands at the same time. If providing great customer service is exceeding customer expectations at the store, and if branding’s job is defining those expectations, then, why do so many companies feel that customer service and branding are two separate functions? Why do HR and Operations determine the service standards and how to implement them while Marketing is charged with developing a brand strategy that will communicate to the customer what to expect when they come to the store? In fact, everyone should work together to insure that the service standards and the brand promises are in synch with each other.

We see so many fast food retailers put a sign up on their marquees or in their windows saying “Now Hiring, Smiling Faces”. Sure we all would rather a smiling face on the other side of the counter or drive-thru window, but what we really want is someone who will get our order right, get it to us fast, and all the time speak a language we can understand. Efficiency is a lot more important in this industry than a gleeful employee (to the customer that is), Looking at last month’s retail sales results, I noted that the stores that did well in an otherwise slow month, were those who are doing a great job with their brands and exceeding customer expectations at the same time.
Stores like Costco (+7.0% comps), Target (+6.1), JCPenney (+11.0) and Nordstrom (+9.4) all have great brands, and they all provide different levels of customer service. But these levels are consistent to what they are promising to their customers via their brand strategy. Costco provides a different level of service than Whole Foods even though they are in similar businesses. Nordstrom promises more service when they sell a pair of shoes than does Payless. JCPenney has gone very promotional, yet still offers a better experience than most department stores out there.

It’s proof once again that when the brand strategy is developed, all of the departments must agree to it and make sure that they live up to it. “Customer Relationship Management” is popular today and a lot of money is being spent to keep existing customers and geting them to spend more. Don’t make it harder than it is. Branding is about the relationship with the customer and it starts with providing customer service that consistently meets or exceeds our marketing promises

< Press Play Arrow to view 60 second video introduction.
Back when I was SVP-Marketing and Branding at PetSmart, one of the keys to our strategy was identifying the “Truth and The Heart” of the brand. Our agency, Publicis USA, had developed “Truth and The Heart” and maintained—and I agreed—that you first develop the “Truth” or the hard facts of what the brand was (things like number of stores, categories, prices, displays, programs, etc) in order to define your points of differentiation. Once these facts were established, then it was critical to identify and develop “The Heart” of the brand—those emotional reasons for shopping the store, whether it was caring associates, programs like pet adoptions, easy refunds, personal communications, professional vets or trainers, in order to build a true relationship with our customer. And if you have no relationship with them, then you really don’t have a brand that will succeed.

This all came back to me while attending the National Speakers Association Annual Convention in San Diego this week. Speaker after speaker zeroed in on this past year’s theme by emphasizing that to be an effective communicator who has an impact on his/her audience, you had to have differentiating substance to what your topics, your target audience, and your calls to action would be; what is it that separates you from the thousands of others on the platforms at the many meetings and conferences held each year? To that end, I have focused my presentations this year specifically on the importance of getting people on the floor and throughout the organization to live up to the brand in everything they do on the job. Unless we achieve totalbrandintegration® in making sure our culture reflects the brand strategy we are communicating to our customers, there is little chance for long-term success.

The most important ingredient for this brand culture is to develop a “soul” in our people that truly makes this a way of life as they service our customers. For years, Southwest Airlines has been known not only as the country’s most successful airline but as the airline whose people personify its brand. As their COO said not long ago, “We are a company in the customer service business who happens to fly airplanes.” No question where Herb Kelleher put the soul and substance in his company.

While I was in Juneau, Alaska, a couple weeks ago, we decided to take the city bus out to Mendenhall Glacier for the day. As I waited, a young man named William spotted that I was wearing a Cox Broadcasting fleece vest and struck up a conversation. He was thinking that I might have an opportunity for him in television. I quickly clarified that it was a free-bee, but he was really interested in marketing and the future of big companies in the US. While he was a musician, he asked some relevant questions about my thoughts on whether all of the consolidations, buyouts, and venture capital takeovers would reduce the competitive market so much that there would be no innovation and no excitement in consumer marketing. Thinking about it, I assured him that there was still plenty of competition and plenty of good marketing—if we maintain branding as the soul and substance of our stores, products, or services. Having recently worked for some venture capital investors, I was made aware of the importance of cash flow and making the sales numbers. I’m afraid sometimes we forget that it is the “soul” of the business and the way our people relate to the customer that really makes the difference. William asked the right questions, and as I watched the glacier “calve” in many pieces, I thought how many chains are also falling apart because they miss the two most important ingredients that make a lasting contract with their customers.

Last week, I spoke to a Brand Management class of MBA students at the University of South Florida where we had a lively discussion about how long it takes for branding to work. I had stated in my presentation that many companies, especially retailers, fail to establish their brands because they are looking for immediate results (sales) as soon as they start their marketing efforts behind the brand strategy. So often what happens is that the company or store will spend months with consultants and/or agencies. developing a strategy within the organization Then they will budget an aggressive amount of advertising and marketing funds to launch the new strategy, much of which is upfront to “really hit the ground running”. After a couple months or so, they are quick to pull the plug—or at least go into hibernation marketing-wise—because they are not seeing an immediate return on their advertising investment.

This sort of reminds me of the 15-minute dating services that you may have seen on some of the news magazine programs recently. You know, this is where about 15 single guys and 15 single ladies sign up for a night of a dating blitz where they each get 15 minutes at a table together, then the bell goes off and they all scatter (like musical chairs participants) to another table and another Mr. or Ms. Right and start all over again. They do this all night and then hope that they get a subsequent, more quality, date with the one they liked best. One thing is for sure, these are not relationship workshops. “Whiz bam, thank you Ma’am” is more like it. Retailers today think about marketing and branding in the same way. Build a multi-media campaign, blitz the airways over a few weeks and then watch the customers pour in with their cash to make a purchase and, of course, become loyal shoppers who want to sign up immediately for your CRM card and carefully thought-out e-mailings targeted for their need and likes.

Well, as I told the students that night, it just doesn’t work that way. Branding is building a meaningful relationship with your customers and potential customers. And it just doesn’t happen in a couple 30-second or 16-page by-chance encounters. It takes time and it takes consistency for the relationship to develop. It also takes internal development (kind of like getting the right clothes or make-up for that dating session) to ensure that the organization understands what kind of relationship you expect them to have with the customer. Some of the most successful brands have kept the same brand strategy, with revisions to keep up with the times and changing competition, for many years to insure a loyal customer base and relationship. Sure the communications have to be freshened up with new messages and new creative, but the strategy (if sound) must be nurtured in all aspects of the business if you want to keep a positive relationship with the customer.

Daniel Burrus, CEO of Burrus Research, spoke recently at the Global Retail Marketing Summit in St. Petersburg, FL about the importance of building a relationship. In fact, he said, “The future is all about Relationships.” The key he said was to enhance TRUST with your customers if you are going to succeed. We have to “de-commoditize” continuously if we are going to stay ahead of the competition by constantly exceeding customer expectations. The importance of keeping at it everlastingly (as N.W. Ayer once said) will strengthen our brands and keep the entire organization on track.

As I get ready to go to Alaska for two weeks of relationship building with my wife, Sandi (and to celebrate our 40th Anniversary), I am more convinced than ever that to build a brand or a relationship, one must be committed to it, have a passion for it, and work hard at it…everyday.

Click below to view my interview on Media Talk last week.

PLAY THIS 30 SECOND VIDEO NOW.
John Costello is one of the top marketers in the U.S. and has made his mark at Home Deport, Sears, and Yahoo and is now President—Consumer & Retailer at Pay By Touch. The new company uses technology to use fingerprints, among other things, to identify customer shopping behaviors and preferences. Well, John certainly left his fingerprint on the recent Global Retail Marketing Association’s inaugural Summit at St. Petersburg Beach. A common thread throughout the excellent presentations at this meeting was the skyrocketing growth of technology, especially mobile media (cell phones), for retailers and service providers in today’s marketing programs.

One of the points John made, however, really resonated with me and my passion to get everyone in the organization involved with the brand strategy. He recommended that today’s successful marketing organizations should be organized by objective rather than by function as has been the norm for years. Instead of having VP’s of Advertising, Marketing, Branding, Creative, etc., the marketing organization leaders should be determined by the Who (most important customer segments), the What (differentiates the brand vs. competition), and the How (integrated marketing and advertising). To accomplish this, the former VP’s would now take on the rolls such as VP-Customer Intelligence and Insights (Who), VP-Brand and Product Marketing (What) and VP-Integrated Marketing Communications (How).

I think it’s about time that this type of thinking becomes the norm in our organizations where the brand should drive not just the marketing functions, but the entire organization. The operations need to be clued in to the brand strategy and organized so that the place where the customer gets his/her brand impression (the store) is consistent to the message. Human Resources needs to be set in finding people who will live up to the brand – whether it’s at the store or behind the scenes, IT needs to provide the technology and systems to stay up with the brand strategy and a technology savvy customer and employee base. The CEO has to become the Brand Champion who sets the pace, ensuring that the message is integrated into all decisions going forward. In short, it’s everyone’s job and it should be organized around the brand not around a chart of functions.

Until we get over the silos that currently hinder the effectiveness of today’s organizations and truly understand that the brand is the DNA that makes up the store, product or service’s reason for being, I’m afraid branding will continue to be simply a marketing function—for those who want to see their market share dwindle in the future.

For more information about the GRMA Summit, go to www.globalretailmarketing.com . Kudo’s to Sonny Nardulli and Stephanie Fischer on bringing a great forum for progressive thinkers to the retail industry.

View the 40 second video first.
Last week, my former employer, Circuit City, announced a new wave of cost cutting efforts where by 3,400 employees would be fired and replaced by lower-paid workers in order to become more competitive with other electronics retailers. However, being competitive doesn’t necessarily mean that you have to have the lowest cost efficiencies and lower sale prices,. To me, this is just another step in becoming less of a factor in their category and a guarantee that the market share will continue to erode.

Back in the mid-90’s, Circuit City was the number one choice by American consumers for their electronics and appliance purchases. At that time, we conducted over 3000 interviews with consumers and determined that, in fact, most of them preferred the CC format in providing knowledgeable salespeople and helpful service while maintaining competitive pricing. Just a couple years ago, while working in that category again on the agency side, I consistently read a lot of research indicating that customers, especially females (who now have a say in over 80% of electronics purchases), still had a lot of questions when it came to making technology purchases and would appreciate someone more than a cashier when deciding on what to buy.

The discontinuance of commission salespeople accelerated CC’s move toward self-service and the latest move should put them right there with Wal-Mart who doesn’t promise to be anything more than a low price source. I can’t help but think of The Container Store where they have not only one of the most loyal employee groups, but also one of the highest paid. Consistently rated one of the best places to work in the country, The Container Store has made selling basic “stuff” exciting and it all happens at the store level. I recall hearing the companies’ founders, Kip Tindell and Garrett Boone, say that the key was keeping and paying the best employees. They insisted that a great employee could do more work than three so-so employees and they could pay them twice as much and still be cost effective.

Branding is much more than just a low price. It starts with a great strategy and then having people in the store (who are the brand to the customer) who are motivated and excited about the store and the merchandise they sell. With this latest move, I’m sure that the quality of service at a store that used to promote it was “where service is state of the art” will become not only non-existent, but also a detriment to future share growth. No wonder more electronics buyers (note I did not say “shoppers”) are going on-line or to the warehouse stores to get what they want.

It forecasts a continuance of Circuit City’s lagging sales and diminished market share trends, and I don’t think even having Jim Nantz (who, by the way, did the play by play of the Florida Gators’ championship win) in their commercials will motivate the customers to come back or the employees to do a great job.